...From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. – Luke 12:48
If you’ve been around church for any length of time, you’ve most likely heard this phrase. If you’re into superheroes, you’ve probably heard the famous line from Uncle Ben, “With great power comes great responsibility.”
While these two phrases aren’t synonymous, they both speak to a common principle: we are responsible with only what we have been given. And the more you have been given, the greater the responsibility.
As we await his return, we are responsible to make the most of the time and resources we have. We have no right do use these blessings for our own advantage. We are stewards of what we have as we wait for our Savior’s return.
What Is the Context around This Scripture?
Luke 12:48 is in the context of Jesus’ instructions to his disciples regarding their responsibilities after Jesus returns to the Father in Heaven. As an illustration, he talks about a servant/master relationship. Servants are to “stay dressed for action” (Luke 12:35) and stay “awake” (Luke 12:37).
Then the apostle Peter asks if the parable is for the disciples or for all people. Instead of directly answering his question, Jesus expounds on his illustration more by asking the question, “who then is the faithful and wise manager, whom his master will set over his household, to give them their portion of food at the proper time?” (Luke 12:42).
Those servants who faithfully steward the gifts entrusted to them will be rewarded upon the master’s return. Those who squander the time (Luke 12:45) will be held responsible for their casual treatment of their master’s resources.
Even those who “plead” ignorance aren’t full without responsibility (Luke 12:48).
Photo Credit: ©GettyImages/asiseeit
Who Is the Author of Luke 12:48?
This passage (and the larger book) is written by—you guessed it—Luke. Although he wasn’t an apostle who was with Jesus throughout his earthly ministry, this gentile physician and associate of the Apostle Paul recorded both the events surrounding Jesus’ life and death and also the formation and spread of the early church in the book of Acts.
His opening to the Gospel of Luke gives insight into his approach: “It seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught” (Luke 1:1-3).
Luke’s purpose in this Gospel is to provide certainty regarding the teaching and life of Jesus. Passages like Luke 12:48, therefore, are meant to instill confidence in our hearts regarding what Jesus Christ desires from his followers during his absence.
How Do Various Bible Translations Phrase This Verse?
Every now and then, certain phrases from Scripture remain largely unchanged. “To whom much has been given, much shall be required” is one of those phrases. Some English versions change the word order here or there, but not significantly.
The NIV does replace “required” with “demanded,” which might convey the meaning more clearly to the English reader. In other words, “required” is not referring to a specific list of “requirements” we are to do, but rather to the fact that we will be held accountable for what we have been given.
The more we have been given, the more we are accountable for.
It also highlights the fact that we as Christians don’t really have the option regarding how we use our gifts. It is a “demand” by our Master to use our gifts for his glory.
How Is This Phrase Applied or Misunderstood Today?
For New Testament believers today, the most direct application of this principle is related to life in the church. Scripture states that each believer is given spiritual gifts by the Holy Spirit (Romans 12:3; Ephesians 4:7), meant for the mutual edification and growth of the church. We are to use our gifts faithfully (Romans 12:6-8), being good “caretakers” of those gifts. To use our spiritual gifts for selfish reasons would be poor stewardship.
But even beyond our spiritual gifts in the church, there isn’t a single thing in our lives that escapes this principle because absolutely everything we have is a gift from God. 1 Corinthians 4:7 says, “What do you have that you did not receive? If then you received it, why do you boast as if you did not receive it?"
My finances, my family, my house, my time, my heartbeat, and my talents are all gracious gifts from a gracious God.
One way someone might misunderstand this principle is by concluding that those with less have less responsibility—that they don’t have to be as responsible with what they do have. Nothing can be further from the truth.
Whether you have been entrusted with little or much, our commitment to faithful stewardship remains the same. The only thing that changes is not how responsible we should be, but rather, how muchwe are responsible for. This idea is clarified in a helpful parallel passage below.
Photo Credit: ©GettyImages/jodie777
Scripture Verses Related to Luke 12:48
In Matthew 25:14-30, Jesus tells “The Parable of the Talents.” In this story, three servants are given responsibility by their master for three different sums of money: five talents, two talents, and one talent. The amount to each servant was decided “according to his ability” (Matthew 25:15).
The servants with five talents and two talents took the money, invested and traded, and returned double the amount to the master upon his return. The servant with one talent, instead of investing, buried his in the ground. The servants entrusted with the five and two talents were commended, while the servant with the one talent was sternly rebuked and punished.
Jesus ends the parable with a familiar-sounding phrase: “For everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away” (Matthew 25:29).
Notice that servants with the five talents and two talents, although they had different amounts, approached their task with the same level of commitment. Although the amounts were different, their stewardship and faithfulness were the same.
It doesn’t matter if you have been given much or little. The master was just as pleased with the servant with two talents as he was with the servant with five talents. God isn’t concerned with how much or how little you have, he is concerned with what you are doing with what you have been given.
There is a wonderful message of comfort here: God will never hold you accountable for what he has not given you. Simply focus on what you have been given and be faithful in that, rather than wonder why you haven’t been given more.
A Prayer for Discerning What Is Required
Dear Heavenly Father,
Everything I have is a gift from you. I know that, because of my sin, I deserve nothing more than separation from you for all eternity. Yet, in your graciousness, you have poured out your blessings on me.
Thank you for entrusting these gifts to me. Give me the faithfulness necessary to use these gifts for your glory. Help me to use my time and talents, not for my own enjoyment or benefit, for the good of others.
In Jesus Name,Amen.
Photo Credit: ©GettyImages/Ridofranz
Aaron Berry is a co-author for the Pursuing the Pursuer Blog. You can read more articles from Aaron and his colleagues by subscribing to their blog or following them on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Aaron currently resides in Allen Park, MI with his wife and two children, where he serves in his local church and recently completed an MDiv degree at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary.
To whom much is given, much will be required (Luke 12:48). If you have heard that line of wisdom, you know it means we are held responsible for what we have. If we have been blessed with talents, wealth, knowledge, time, and the like, it is expected that we benefit others.
Giving is a facet of a larger subject called stewardship. According to James 1:17, God owns everything because He is the Creator, Maker and Giver of all things — so when we give, we are merely giving back a portion of what belongs to God anyway.
Luke 12:48 states, "From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked." I came into this summer experience ready to help enact change in the Uganda Judicial system.
It means befriending the poor and the weak, alleviating suffering, righting wrongs, defending truth, strengthening the rising generation, and achieving security and happiness at home. Much of our redemptive work on earth is to help others grow and achieve their just hopes and aspirations…
This applies to those who have managed to make the most of what they have been given and have been entrusted with an increase as a result of faithfulness. #2 “will be given more,” In general, with what a man or woman proves to be faithful, they will receive more of. #3 “and they will have an abundance.”
When John F Kennedy spoke these words in 1961 he was referencing the Gospel of Luke chapter 12, as he talked about the qualities of great leadership.
For to him who has will more be given; and from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away. — Mark 4:25, RSV. Take heed then how you hear; for to him who has will more be given, and from him who has not, even what he thinks that he has will be taken away. — Luke 8:18, RSV.
God cannot accept the payment of tithes because of what Jesus has done. But God will accept you GIVING A TITHE. He will not punish you if you do not give a tithe.
Like llamas and alpacas, tithes and offerings are grouped together a lot, but they're definitely not the same thing. A tithe is a specific amount (10% of your income) that you give first, and an offering is anything extra that you give beyond that.
2 Corinthians 9:6-8
Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver. And God is able to bless you abundantly, so that in all things at all times, having all that you need, you will abound in every good work.
When we give generously and sacrificially, it's not because God needs anything, but because we want to show our love for him. Giving is an expression of obedience, yes, but also of gratitude, trust, and increasing joy. God seeks out and recognizes those who worship him.
To Spread the Gospel.
Tithing is God's way of supporting the ministry. In the Old Testament, the Levites and the priest were God's minister to the nation of Israel, and they were supported by tithes. In the New Testament, God has called people to minister the gospel.
If you say given that something is the case, you mean taking that fact into account. Usually, I am sensible with money, as I have to be, given that I don't earn that much. See full dictionary entry for given.
DEFINITIONS1. to accept that something is true and not expect it to change. We've taken it as a given that our members are honest.
The definition of given is something handed out, likely to happen, specified or granted. An example of given is a box of books donated to charity; given to charity. An example of given is a person who always shows up late to parties; given to being late.
verb (used with object), gave [geyv], giv·en [giv-uhn], giv·ing. to present voluntarily and without expecting compensation; bestow: to give a birthday present to someone. to hand to someone: Give me that plate, please. to place in someone's care: If you give me your coat, I'll put it in the closet.
|on condition that||presuming that|
|provided that||allowing that|
To scold or chastise (someone). Primarily heard in Ireland. Would you stop giving out already?
Giving is a present tense of give whereas given is the past participle of give. Giving is an act of charity or generosity whereas given also stands for inclined or being prone to. Given is confused with giving as both have a similar pronunciation. Given also refers to a fixed quantity or a specific time.
"It's certainly not a given" is a rather indirect way of saying that arguments exist against your position. If something is a given, it is not debatable and it is pretty much universally accepted.
Given a regularity for man-made objects, regular shape can also be seen from buildings roofs and roof corners. I prefer to start the sentence with Given, Being as I saw texts in many text books do so.
2 : to value (something or someone) too lightly : to fail to properly notice or appreciate (someone or something that should be valued) We often take our freedom for granted.
Given can be a noun, a preposition, an adjective or a verb.
Use "gave". If you use "has given", it would imply she is still alive and giving brilliant and memorable performances. "Miss Smith worked for us for three years." (She is no longer working for us.)
Given these points, most proposed measures to respond to this bias are too piecemeal to be adequate. Given these points, it is tempting to say that the two parties agree on all of the facts and that their dispute is merely verbal.
The phrase, “to whom much is given much is required” is an upfront reminder by God that even if He has given a lot for us, we have to be generous.
The book of Luke specifically states this, “Give, and it will be given to you.. Acts 20:35 states, “In all things I have shown you that by working hard in this way we must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he himself said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’”. But God reminds us through Paul that he wants his people to be generous as well.. The phrase, “to whom much is given much is required” also means that “no one has the right to live alone for himself” rather, it specifically implies that much is required from one individual.. We can read this in the Bible as Paul writes to the Romans and says, “For none of us lives for ourselves alone, and none of us dies for ourselves alone” ( Romans 14:7 ).. The phrase, “to whom much is given much is required” also emphasizes that everything we receive comes with great responsibility.. He is the reason why we can do generous things.. It also reminds us that we are not alone in the quest for doing good and that we have to be responsible in using His gifts.. It also reminds us that God has given us talents and that we have to use these talents that He has given to exalt His mighty name.
Western leaders gave multiple assurances against NATO expansion to Gorbachev in 1990-1991 according to declassified American, Russian, British, Germans documents
Washington D.C., December 12, 2017 – U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University ( http://nsarchive.gwu.edu ).. He agreed with Gorbachev’s statement in response to the assurances that “NATO expansion is unacceptable.” Baker assured Gorbachev that “neither the President nor I intend to extract any unilateral advantages from the processes that are taking place,” and that the Americans understood that “not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” (See Document 6). Baker said it again, directly to Gorbachev on May 18, 1990 in Moscow, giving Gorbachev his “nine points,” which included the transformation of NATO, strengthening European structures, keeping Germany non-nuclear, and taking Soviet security interests into account.. (See Document 23). The U.S. State Department’s subsequent view of the German unification negotiations, expressed in a 1996 cable sent to all posts, mistakenly asserts that the entire negotiation over the future of Germany limited its discussion of the future of NATO to the specific arrangements over the territory of the former GDR.. As published in the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s official 2010 documentary history of the UK’s input into German unification, this memorandum of British Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd’s conversation with West German Foreign Minister Genscher on February 6, 1990, contains some remarkable specificity on the issue of future NATO membership for the Central Europeans.. Although heavily redacted compared to the Soviet accounts of these conversations, the official State Department version of Secretary Baker’s assurances to Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze just before the formal meeting with Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, contains a series of telling phrases.. The key exchange takes place when Baker asks whether Gorbachev would prefer “a united Germany outside of NATO, absolutely independent and without American troops; or a united Germany keeping its connections with NATO, but with the guarantee that NATO’s jurisdiction or troops will not spread east of the present boundary.” Thus, in this conversation, the U.S. secretary of state three times offers assurances that if Germany were allowed to unify in NATO, preserving the U.S. presence in Europe, then NATO would not expand to the east.. He says that although Kohl and Genscher’s ideas are interesting, “even those points in their proposals with which we agree would have to have guarantees.. Ambassador Braithwaite’s telegram summarizes the meeting between Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Douglas Hurd and President Gorbachev, noting Gorbachev’s “expansive mood.” Gorbachev asks the secretary to pass his appreciation for Margaret Thatcher’s letter to him after her summit with Kohl, at which, according to Gorbachev, she followed the lines of policy Gorbachev and Thatcher discussed in their recent phone call, on the basis of which the Soviet leader concluded that “the British and Soviet positions were very close indeed.” Hurd cautions Gorbachev that their positions are not 100% in agreement, but that the British “recognized the importance of doing nothing to prejudice Soviet interests and dignity.” Gorbachev, as reflected in Braithwaite’s summary, speaks about the importance of building new security structures as a way of dealing with the issue of two Germanies: “If we are talking about a common dialogue about a new Europe stretching from the Atlantic to the Urals, that was one way of dealing with the German issue.” That would require a transitional period to pick up the pace of the European process and “synchronise it with finding a solution to the problem of the two Germanies.” However, if the process was unilateral – only Germany in NATO and no regard for Soviet security interest – the Supreme Soviet would be very unlikely to approve such a solution and the Soviet Union would question the need to speed up the reduction of its conventional weapons in Europe.. Among many issues in the conversation, the center of gravity is on German unification and NATO, on which, Powell notes, Gorbachev’s “views were still evolving.” Rather than agreeing on German unification in NATO, Gorbachev talks about the need for NATO and the Warsaw pact to move closer together, from confrontation to cooperation to build a new Europe: “We must mould European structures so that they helped us find the common European home.
The leftists. themselves feel that these groups are inferior..  But. the leftist is too far gone for that.. Such a. man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems.. Autonomy as a part of the power process may not be necessary for every individual.. The power process is the process of satisfying the drives of the. second group.. Individuals with a weak. drive for power may have relatively little need to go through the power process, or at least relatively little. need for autonomy in the power process.. They may have. insufficient autonomy in the power process (their work may consist of following orders) and some of their. drives may be frustrated (e.g., security, aggression).. Another way in which people satisfy their need for the power process is through surrogate activities.. But even if most people in industrial-technological society were well satisfied, we (FC) would still be. opposed to that form of society, because (among other reasons) we consider it demeaning to fulfill ones. need for the power process through surrogate activities or through identification with an organization, rather. than through pursuit of real goals.
Chapter 1 Executive Summary
Chapter 3 explores observed impacts and projected risks to a range of natural and human systems, with a focus on how risk levels change from 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming.. Several regional changes in climate are assessed to occur with global warming up to 1.5°C as compared to pre-industrial levels, including warming of extreme temperatures in many regions ( high confidence ), increases in frequency, intensity and/or amount of heavy precipitation in several regions ( high confidence ), and an increase in intensity or frequency of droughts in some regions ( medium confidence ).. Overshooting poses large risks for natural and human systems, especially if the temperature at peak warming is high, because some risks may be long-lasting and irreversible, such as the loss of some ecosystems ( high confidence ).. Temperature means and extremes are also projected to be higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C in most land regions, with increases being 2–3 times greater than the increase in GMST projected for some regions ( high confidence ).. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would limit risks of increases in heavy precipitation events on a global scale and in several regions compared to conditions at 2°C global warming ( medium confidence ).. Risks to natural and human systems are expected to be lower at 1.5°C than at 2°C of global warming ( high confidence ).. Lower rates of change enhance the ability of natural and human systems to adapt, with substantial benefits for a wide range of terrestrial, freshwater, wetland, coastal and ocean ecosystems (including coral reefs) ( high confidence ), as well as food production systems, human health, and tourism ( medium confidence ), together with energy systems and transportation ( low confidence) .. Global warming of 1.5°C would also lead to an expansion of the global land area with significant increases in runoff ( medium confidence ) and an increase in flood hazard in some regions ( medium confidence ) compared to present-day conditions.. Current ecosystem services from the ocean are expected to be reduced at 1.5°C of global warming, with losses being even greater at 2°C of global warming ( high confidence ) .. Long-term risks of coastal flooding and impacts on populations, infrastructures and assets ( high confidence ), freshwater stress ( medium confidenc e), and risks across marine ecosystems ( high confidence ) and critical sectors ( medium confidence ) are projected to increase at 1.5°C compared to present-day levels and increase further at 2°C, limiting adaptation opportunities and increasing loss and damage ( medium confidence ).
The Second Vatican Council (1962-65) was a unique ecumenical council. The previous twenty were assembled to address particular doctrinal or ecclesial crises, while John XXIII called Vatican II to layout a new pastoral program for engaging the modern world. It was not a particular crisis but a general one, focused on finding a new way of conveying the Christian life in the modern world.
Pope John XXIII leads the opening session of the Second Vatican Council in St. Peter's Basilica Oct. 11, 1962.. The “Spirit of Vatican II” belonged to the former interpretation and came to stand for a whole new way of thinking, praying, teaching, and living as a Catholic in the modern world, marked by a much greater openness to the world and aversion to traditional Catholic practices.. Does Vatican II have to remain a “super Council” that guides all aspects of the Church’s life and approach?. As a pastoral Council, has its approach failed and is it time to move on to the next phase of the Church’s life?. I think we can actually get clarity about this “idea.” Following the debates for years, I would identify three major areas: liturgy, conscience, and synodality as three particularly relevant points of disagreement over the legacy of Vatican II.. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970: § 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs.”. In his book The Feast of Faith , Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, pointed out that “it is simply a fact that the Council was pushed aside” in liturgical reform (84).. In order to make this reality more prominent in the Church, the Council called for more frequent synods: “This sacred ecumenical synod earnestly desires that the venerable institution of synods and councils flourish with fresh vigor.. Although Francis speaks of the rejection of the Council by reactionary groups, synodality has been used by others, especially in Germany, as a pretext for rejecting the very faith upheld by Vatican II and all previous councils.. Syndolity, however, cannot trump the Church’s magisterial teaching, but should rather finds way of communicating it more effectively in the modern world, which was the stated goal of the Second Vatican Council.. Beyond rejecting the legitimacy of Vatican II and its teaching, it is different matter to question the effectiveness of its pastoral strategy and its continued relevance for pointing the Church toward the future.. It should not surprise us if the next sixty years requires a pivot in pastoral approach.. It will be more helpful to shift the conversation away from debating the last sixty years to what is now needed for the changing landscape of the Church and world.
The term repass is used when a person passes away and their body is passed through the funeral procession. It can also be used to describe a meal that consists of food from the funeral meal. A funeral repast or repass is a meal served at funerals in the United Kingdom. The meal includes food […]
The term repass is used when a person passes away and their body is passed through the funeral procession.. It can also be used to describe a meal that consists of food from the funeral meal.. A funeral repast or repass is a meal served at funerals in the United Kingdom.. Funeral Reception or Repass (Repast). A funeral reception (or repass) is a gathering that takes place after a funeral or memorial ceremony.. The distinction between repass and repast as verbs is that repass means to pass (back) again, particularly in the opposite way; to return, while repast means to provide food to; to feast (obsolete|transitive).. Funeral repasts are most often held in a friend’s or relative’s house, a church banquet hall, or the funeral home’s repast venue.. A funeral reception (or repass) is a gathering that takes place after a funeral or memorial ceremony.. A normal funeral ceremony lasts around an hour, however depending on tradition and religious beliefs, some funerals may last several days.. Many families have a Memorial Gathering in lieu of or in addition to a funeral ceremony.. The repass tradition is a funeral custom where the family of the deceased person passes through the room in which they are lying to show their respect.. What is a funeral repass?. A funeral repass is a ceremony in which the body of a deceased person is taken from the home and placed back into it.. Is it repass or repast for funeral?Why do people call a funeral a repass?. Related Tags repass funeral origin what is a repass repast meal who pays for dinner after funeral repass lunch
People love to read Psalms 91, but it starts with a powerful statement that describes whom this psalm applies to. If you want to enjoy God’s protection like it was described in Psalms 91, the…
“He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High” (Psalms 91:1).. What does it really mean to dwell in the secret place of the Most High?. God protects His people.. It means that the one whom God will protect is someone who actively lives a godly life .. He will dwell in the secret place .
What does Jesus mean in John 6:44 when He says, "No one can come to me unless the Father draws him"? ›
John 6 contains some tough teachings. What does it mean in John 6:44 that no one can come to Jesus unless the Father draws him? Why did Jesus choose the twelve?
And in fact, since this entire chapter is about how followers of God become followers of Jesus, and since we have consistently seen in previous posts that election is to service , it is better to understand John 6:70 in this regard, as well as the other verses in this chapter about those who come to Jesus.. The various groups of John 6 could be pictured with a Venn diagram, where there is a group of people who believe in Jesus for eternal life but choose not to follow Him (John 6:60, 66), and there is a group who follow Him but who do not believe in Him for eternal life (John 6:70-71), but there is one overlapping group of people who both believe in Him and follow Him (John 6:68-69).. Since Jesus is sent from God, those who follow God will now follow Jesus, and Jesus will not drop, reject, or lose anyone who comes to Him from God (John 6:39).. They belonged to God, but were given to Jesus by God (John 17:9) so that they might behold the glory of God in Jesus Christ (John 17:24).. In other words, Jesus is saying that if someone wants to be chosen by God and given to Jesus, that person can simply believe in Jesus for eternal life.. God will give such people to Jesus, and Jesus will lose none of them, but will raise all of them on the last day (John 6:40, 44).
Has anyone ever told you that you are too sensitive or too emotional? You might belong to a special group of people known as empaths.
Do you feel drained when you spend time around certain people?. When a friend of yours is feeling particularly happy or distressed do you find yourself feeling these same emotions?. Empaths are highly sensitive individuals, who have a keen ability to sense what people around them are thinking and feeling.. Because empaths quite literally feel what their friends are going through, they can become overwhelmed by painful emotions, such as anxiety or anger.. Crowds can feel particularly overwhelming to empaths, who are often highly sensitive to certain noises and incessant chatter.. Being naturally caring and concerned for others, empaths have a hard time saying “no.” This can lead to problems as you overcommit and drain yourself emotionally.. Dr. Orloff suggests, “Control how much time you spend listening to stressful people, and learn to say ‘no.’ Set clear limits and boundaries with people, nicely cutting them off at the pass if they get critical or mean.. They may think things like, “Why do you feel so much all the time?
posted by Weaver
Targeting a major civilian population area also does not make much military sense, because if any country would be foolish enough to risk a first strike against the U.S., chances are they would target military bases and our naval ships ( remember Pearl Harbor in WWII, the Japanese bombed our ships, and not the cities in Hawaii ), seeking to destroy places where nukes are kept to reduce the chances of retaliation.. Given the current political climate and the constant use of fear to keep the public in a never-ending state of terror so that they gladly accept government solutions that sacrifice freedom for slavery, the more logical explanation is to keep New Yorkers (and the rest of the country) in a perpetual state of being afraid of the next “big thing.”. Could we be looking at “false flag” attacks on American soil that are actually orchestrated by our own government, who will then turn around and blame some foreign entity, such as Russia, in order to justify more government actions to keep people at home and off the streets as they did during the COVID plandemic?. I certainly do not want to minimize the potential risks to a nuclear missile strike, but it would also be foolish to just trust what the government is saying as they have no more credibility when it comes to telling the truth, especially when they push “solutions” to problems they create, such as COVID “vaccines” that have killed and injured millions for a “virus” that was just a replacement for the annual flu virus, and to which there were multiple pre-existing solutions for the symptoms attributed to COVID, both natural and pharmaceutical products, such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.. If you are among the segment of the population who still believes in the government that they basically tell the truth and are concerned about public welfare, and that anything contrary to that belief is a “conspiracy theory” by crazy people, then you are probably going to suffer the worst when whatever the next big “thing” is to create fear and panic actually happens.. We are witnessing a planned destruction of the global financial systems in order to implement a “New World Order” that will have fewer people but more “sustainable” green solutions to “save the planet.”. And since so many people do not agree with this New World Order, they will do whatever they can, and whatever the public allows them to do, to implement this planned New World Order.. Fear is your biggest enemy right now, and while most of our recent articles have been very gloomy with mostly bad news, my purpose in publishing these articles is to prepare you for what is coming, so that you can be informed and do NOT have to fear, but trust in a righteous God who is still in control, and to look at your enemy in the face and NOT back down.. Breitbart News reported today about a World Economic Forum (WEF) position paper released today that explains how they WANT gas prices to go higher to punish people who do not follow their tyrannical methods to force people to adopt their plans.. The World Economic Forum (WEF) released a position paper Monday that inexorably links two claimed global crises as one – “climate change” and the “decline of democracy.”. It goes on to say ignoring progress toward a “low-carbon economy could put democracies in greater economic peril, not less” while repeating the broader demand of environmental activists for companies to stop investing fossil fuels.. Those who dare to oppose their plans will be punished, and we have seen many examples of this already, including a major section of the American workforce, from healthcare workers, to law enforcement, pilots, and military members, who refused to comply with COVID vaccine mandates and are no longer a part of the workforce.. That cooling off period ends at midnight on July 18, and a coalition of unions could choose to go on strike at that point, said Sheet Metal Air Rail Transportation union president Jeremy Ferguson.
Doubting Thomas: Why The Failure to Cancel a Supreme Court Justice May Not Mean Much for Other “Contingent” Faculty ›
Below is my column in the New York Post on the recent cancel campaign targeting Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. It was always doubtful that a law school would take the unprecedented step of barr…
Skip to content Below is my column in the New York Post on the recent cancel campaign targeting Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.. The problem is that most targets of these campaigns have neither the status nor the day job of a Supreme Court justice.. The controversy, however, highlights a much more serious problem for faculty who do not have the high profile of a Supreme Court justice.. Within hours of the Dobbs decision overturning Roe, Thomas was again the focus of racist and profane attacks.. Nothing new for Thomas.. Of course, if one thing is clear from decades of unfair and unrelenting attacks, Thomas does not walk away from a mob .. When I began teaching 30 years ago, universities were bastions of free speech where a wide array of views and values were steadfastly defended.. Most professors are not protected by tenure, and universities can cite other reasons for not renewing their contracts.. Roughly three of four faculty today are what are called “contingent faculty,” or faculty who work contract to contract.. Public campaigns are often designed to get dissenting faculty to cancel themselves or leave them marginalized in their own academic communities.. The difference is that as a tenured faculty member, I remain protected from calls for termination.. Of course, universities can make continuing on a faculty intolerable by shifting classes, keeping professors off academic panels and committees and subjecting them to public ridicule, including citing them as examples of intolerance .. He killed himself a few days before his final day as a professor.