Acheson, D. 1969. Present at the Creation, My Years in the State Department. New York: W. Norton.Google Scholar
Alford, R. P. 2006. “Reflections on US – Zeroing: A Study in Judicial Overreaching by the WTO Appellate Body,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 45:196–220.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D. and Müller, A. C.. 2017. “The Revised WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA): Key Design Features and Significance for Global Trade and Development,” WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2017-04.
Bacchus, J. 2017. “The Case for a WTO Climate Waiver,” Centre for International Governance Innovation. Special Report published November 2, 2017. www.cigionline.org/publications/case-wto-climate-waiver
Bacchus, J. 2018. “The Content of a WTO Climate Waiver,” Centre for International Governance Innovation. CIGI Papers No. 204 published December 4, 2018. www.cigionline.org/publications/content-wto-climate-waiver
Bellmann, C. 2014. “The Bali Agreement: Implications for Development and the WTO,” International Development Policy [Online], 5.2. http://journals.openedition.org/poldev/1744, last accessed November 12, 2018.
China’s Position Paper on WTO Reform, published November 29, 2018.
Condon, B. J. and Sinha, T.. 2014. “The Role of International Economic Law in Addressing Climate Change,” In: Connecting to Global Markets – Challenges and Opportunities: Case Studies Presented by WTO Chair-holders. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
Davey, W. J. 2009. “The Limits of Judicial Processes,” In: Bethlehem, D., McRae, D., Neufeld, R. and Van Damme, I. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 460–80.Google Scholar
Dawar, K. 2017. “The Government Procurement Agreement, the Most-Favored Nation Principle, and Regional Trade Agreements,” In: Georgopoulos, A., Hoekman, B. and Mavroidis, P. C. (Eds.), The Internationalization of Government Procurement Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–39.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018. COM(2018) 561 final. 36th Annual Reports from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the EU’s Anti-Dumping, Anti-Subsidy and Safeguard activities, July 31, 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2018:0561:FIN:EN:PDF, last accessed December 8, 2018.
European Commission. 2018. L 181/39-83. Commission Implementing Regulation 2018/1013 of July 17, 2018 imposing provisional safeguard measures with regard to imports of certain steel products, July 18, 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1013&from=EN, last accessed October 23, 2018.
EU Statement at the Heads of Delegations meeting by European Commissioner for Trade Cecilia Malmström 2018. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 11th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), December 13, 2017. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/december/tradoc_156464.pdf, last accessed October 1, 2018.
European Commission. 2018. 2018/C111/10. Notice of initiation of a safeguard investigation concerning imports of steel products of March 26, 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:JOC_2018_111_R_0010&from=EN, last accessed December 8, 2018.
European Parliament. 2018. EU Regulation No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 25, 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/978/oj, last accessed December 6, 2018.
European Parliament’s Resolution of November 29, 2018 on WTO: The Way forward. 2018. 2018/2084(INI). www.consilium.europa.eu/media/37247/buenos_aires_leaders_declaration.pdf, last accessed December 8, 2018.
GATT Doc. L/4903. 1979. Differential and more favourable treatment – Reciprocity and fuller participation of developing countries, Decision of November 28, 1979. www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/90970166.pdf, last accessed November 27, 2018.
GATT MIN.DEC. 1986. Ministerial Declaration on the Uruguay Round of September 20, 1986, www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91240152.pdf, last accessed November 26, 2018.
G20. 2018. G20 Leaders’ declaration: Building consensus for fair and sustainable development. Buenos Aires, December 1, 2018, https://g20.org/sites/default/files/buenos_aires_leaders_declaration.pdf.
Häberli, C. 2016. “WTO Rules Can Prevent Change Mitigation for Agriculture,” Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Fifth Biennial Global Conference Working Paper No. 2016/06.
Hahn, M. 2019. “We’ll Always Have Geneva: The Existential Crisis of the US-led Multilateral Trading System and the EU Reactions”, In: Govaere, I. and Garben, S. (Eds.), The Interface Between EU and International Law – Contemporary Reflections, Hart Publishing, pp. 269–92.Google Scholar
Hahn, M. 2018. “The Multilateral an EU Legal Framework on TDIs: An Introduction,” In: Bungenberg, M., Hahn, M., Herrmann, C. and Müller-Ibold, T. (Eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments: Global Policy Trends and Legal Challenges. European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Hahn, M. and Holzer, K.. 2016. “Special Agreement and Energy: Filling the Gaps,” In: Matsushita, M. and Schoenbaum, T. J. (Eds.), Emerging Issues in Sustainable Development: International Trade Law and Policy Relating to Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment. Tokyo: Springer, pp. 259–77.Google Scholar
ICTSD. 2018. “Achieving Progress in Multilateral Trade Negotiations on Agriculture,” WTO: Paths Forward. Policy Brief. September 2018, Geneva: ICTSD.
Jackson, J. H. 1998. The World Trade Organization. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Kaszubska, K. 2016. “Deconstructing India’s Position on the Trade in Services Agreement,” ORF Issue Brief No. 146, www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ORF-IssueBrief_146_Kaszubska.pdf, last accessed November 27, 2018.
Matsushita, M., Schoenbaum, T. J., Mavroidis, P. C. and Hahn, M.. 2017. The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payosova, T., Hufbauer, G. C. and Schott, J. J.. 2018. “The Dispute Settlement Crisis in the World Trade Organization: Causes and Cures,” Peterson Policy Brief, March 2018.
Ptashkina, M. 2018. “Facilitation 2.0: E-Commerce and Trade in the Digital Age,” RTA Exchange. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/rta_exchange_-_ptashkina_-_facilitation_2.0_-_e-commerce_-_ptashkina_0.pdf, last accessed December 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. C., Elsig, M. and Pollack, Mark A.. 2018. “U.S. Threats to the WTO Appellate Body,” UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 1.
Sutherland, P., Bhagwati, J., Botchwey, K., FitzGerald, N., Hamada, K., Jackson, J.H., Lafer, C. and de Montbrial, T.. 2004. “The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium,” Report by the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
TN/RL/GEN/188. World Trade Organization. 2017. Communication from the European Union on Improving Disciplines on Subsidies Notification of May 30, 2017.
USTR. 2018a. Joint Statement on Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of the United States, Japan, and the European Union. May 31, 2018. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/may/joint-statement-trilateral-meeting, last accessed December 3, 2018.
USTR. 2018b. Joint Statement on Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of the United States, Japan, and the European Union. September 25, 2018. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/september/joint-statement-trilateral, last accessed December 3, 2018.
USTR. 2018c. 2017 Report to Congress on the China’s WTO Compliance. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/China%202017%20WTO%20Report.pdf, last accessed December 4, 2018.
USTR. 2018d. Findings of the investigation into China’s acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 of March 22, 2018. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Section%20301%20FINAL.PDF, last accessed December 8, 2018.
USTR. 2018e. Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program Office, March 2018, https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/reports-and-publications/2018/2018-trade-policy-agenda-and-2017, last accessed October 17, 2018.
Weber, R. H. 2015. “Digital Trade and E-Commerce: Challenges and Opportunities of the Asia-Pacific Regionalism,” Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 10(2):321–48.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2017. 20 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Boosting Trade, Innovation and Digital Connectivity. Geneva: WTO.
WT/AB/27. Appellate Body Annual Report for 2016, May 16, 2017, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ab_an_rep_e.htm, accessed on October 17, 2018.
WT/AB/WP/1. Appellate Body. Working Procedures for Appellate Review, February 15, 1996.
WT/AB/WP/6. Appellate Body. Working Procedures for Appellate Review, August 16, 2010.
WT/DSB/M/412, restricted: Dispute Settlement Body, April 27, 2018, Minutes of Meeting, WTO Doc., 1 August 2018 (18-4575), China – Certain Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (DS542).
WT/DSB/W/609. Appellate Body Appointments. Proposal by Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, the European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, Hong Kong, China; Mexico, Nicaragua, Norway, Pakistan, Peru, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Switzerland, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Turkey, Uruguay and Viet Nam, dated November 9, 2017.
WT/DS24/18. US Communication of the June 12, 2006. United States – Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (“Zeroing”). June 16, 2006.
WT/DS121/9. Appellate Body Report. Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, adopted January 12, 2000.
WT/DS248, WT/DS249, WT/DS251, WT/DS252, WT/DS253, WT/DS254, WT/DS258, WT/DS259. Appellate Body Report. United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, adopted December 10, 2003.
WT/DS246/16/Add.3. Appellate Body Report. European Communities – Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, adopted April 20, 2004.
WT/DS296/AB/R. Appellate Body Report. United States – Countervailing Duty Investigation on Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors (DRAMS) from Korea, adopted July 20, 2005.
WT/DS294/46. Panel Report. United States – Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (Zeroing), adopted May 9, 2006.
WT/DS294/46. Appellate Body Report. United States – Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (Zeroing), adopted May 9, 2006.
WT/DS427/R. Panel Report. China – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Broiler Products from the United States, adopted September 25, 2013.
WT/DS397/25. Appellate Body Report. European Communities – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Iron or Steel Fasteners from China - Recourse to article 21.5 of the DSU by China, adopted February 12, 2016.
WT/DS453/AB/R. Appellate Body Report. Argentina – Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services, adopted May 9, 2016.
WT/DS473/AB/R, Appellate Body Report. European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina, WT/DS473/17/Add.4, adopted October 26, 2016.
WT/DS542/1, IP/D/38. China – Certain Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Request for Consultations by the United States, dated March 23, 2018.
WT/DS542/2. China – Certain Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Request to Join Consultation. Communication from Japan, dated April 3, 2018.
WT/DS542/3. China – Certain Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Request to Join Consultations. Communication from the European Union, dated April 4, 2018.
WT/L/641. Amendment of the TRIPS Agreement. Decision adopted on December 6, 2005, dated December 8, 2005.
WT/MIN(13)/DEC. World Trade Organization. Bali Ministerial Declaration adopted on December 7, 2013, dated December 11, 2013.
WT/MIN(15)/45 - WT/L/980, 2015. World Trade Organization. Ministerial Decision of December 19, 2015, on Export Competition, dated December 21, 2015.
Wu, M. 2017. “Digital Trade-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Existing Models and Lessons for the Multilateral Trade System,” RTA Exchange. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/RTA-Exchange-Digital-Trade-Mark-Wu-Final.pdf, last accessed December 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Zhou, W. 2018b. “EU – Price Comparison Methodologies (DS516): Challenging the Non-Market Economy Methodology in Light of the Negotiating History of Article 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol,” Journal of World Trade 52(3):505–533.Google Scholar
Chapter 33 and subsequent alternate chapters carry the story of Jordan (except that Chapters 37-39 are all focused on Jordan).. Chapter 34 and its succeeding alternate ones (with the exception mentioned above) carry the story of Andres, who is trying to get Jordan's message through to Golz.. In Chapter 34, we discover that Andres is aware of what it is that he is fighting for.. In Chapter 35, Jordan is furious with himself for having forgotten what he had known back in the first chapter — that Pablo would only be friendly in order to betray him.. Jordan lies by the sleeping Maria, holding her lightly and feeling the life in her, but at the same time he is keeping track of the time on his wrist watch.. After reading Chapter 36, one might tend to think that Jordan had been somewhat hasty in the preceding chapter in deciding that his criticism of the Spaniards was unjust.. While Andres is trying desperately to get Jordan's message to Golz in time for the attack to be canceled, the soldiers on guard waste time arguing about whether it would not be simpler to just go ahead and kill him.. Chapter 37 shows Jordan's and Maria's last intimate moments together.. Jordan does not have enough men to overcome the enemy guard posts, he no longer has the equipment necessary to blow the bridge properly, and he has very little hope that Golz will cancel the attack even if Andres reaches him in time.. Chapter 40 begins with the ironic observation that Andres had made his way comparatively rapidly through enemy territory, but had been slowed down once he was behind friendly lines.. In spite of the lack of communication within the Loyalist army and the lack of interest in the war on the part of most of the soldiers — two problems with which the reader is already intimately familiar — Andres continues to make some progress.. Hemingway's planning is evident to the reader when he sees Jordan and Anselmo return to the spot from which they had earlier observed the bridge.. At the same time, little by little, the reader is getting a clear idea of the manner in which the coming action will be handled by Jordan and the men.. For Jordan, unable to see the firelight at times, realizes that this is because the man in the sentry box has moved and is standing in front of the brazier.. First, Jordan looks through his field glasses at the sentry and sees a human being — a fact which makes him decide not to look at the man again until the fighting begins.
Returning to the United States in 1921, he married Hadley Richardson and began working as a war correspondent again war reporter.. Hemingway, who worked in Europe as a war correspondent again in 1944, was awarded with a medal of bravery at the American Embassy in Cuba after the Second World War, thanks to this job by the American Army.. The story that begins with a professor named Robert Jordan participating in the Spanish Civil War and acting with the republicans while teaching Spanish in America continues with Robert Jordan being tasked with blowing up a bridge.. In the short time he spent with Pablo’s team, Robert Jordan, who re-weighed all the truths he had known until that day, and often thought about the value of life and what war is, will meet the feeling called love for the first time and comprehend what human means.. Hemingway, who has always been close to the battlefields throughout his life, preferred to describe emotions such as death, life and love in the witnessing of this war.. The episode in which Hemingway experienced death and conveyed his feelings with the first person narrator, especially used by Hemingway, was also one of the most striking parts of the novel that could not be overlooked for a long time.
A good life is not measured by any biblical span.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “I loved you when I saw you today and I loved you always but I never saw you before.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. The cat is the best anarchist.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “But did thee feel the earth move?” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “But in the meantime all the life you have or ever will have is today, tonight, tomorrow, today, tonight, tomorrow, over and over again (I hope), ...” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “The world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “I am an old man who will live until I die," Anselmo said.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. “I suppose if a man has something once, always something of it remains.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. A good life is not measured by any biblical span.” ― Ernest Hemingway, quote from For Whom the Bell Tolls. BookQuoters is a community of passionate readers who enjoy sharing the most meaningful, memorable and interesting quotes from great books.. Books are seen by some as a throwback to a previous world; conversely, gleaning the main ideas of a book via a quote or a quick summary is typical of the Information Age but is a habit disdained by some diehard readers.